From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CF8F038582A0; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:17:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CF8F038582A0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1666603054;
	bh=GLkD71NBcOkqt7sk7Ig6jMJzdfsVXLUboHahrgz6Heo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Vcn1zkhQNY+Lcg5Y7c8yv7UwBCVBIv+BhpUW6niziFmSfjE2Bci1uQRfLKHBAEAoS
	 gyZ8rm3siiK0bRJGjXCcmcytc7Mm1F3zd4XSlFf8NTViF1NnQSUi4xf5wDrdrStPzL
	 L9z6+phNhvQU8YG+87aTQ6FPr/Nb4GxijrIod2+E=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug python/29712] [gdb, aarch64] UNRESOLVED:
 gdb.python/py-disasm.exp: global_disassembler=ReadMemoryGdbErrorDisassembler:
 disassemble test
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:17:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: python
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29712-4717-Pa5D2nAmCv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29712-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29712-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29712

--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Burgess from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 14411 [details]
> > Possible patch for this problem
> >=20
> > Here's my proposal for fixing this issue.  This patch avoids the throw/=
catch
> > over libopcode.  I've tested this on aarch64 and it seems to fix the is=
sue.=20
> > I'm still running the full testsuite.
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
> I'll submit the patch from comment 1.

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-October/193067.html

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=