From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 469983857029; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:56:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 469983857029 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1666785382; bh=mmaOcT63gR+dNOQl0S1YNh69uk0bqNmpUnVghfgofXM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gK2EuxHCejdf7vHeG7ii9rZEaeNiKYTFsl8Q8+ZgoEQde3CPikVutq6HvcZw/gkqM +ObSbzVIs03E+RXlCXZgeRUz4eMh+Jf/InlNdNF95n/3lvlMXrgt5Xx91uCNcbR+pi AsuKz+ULVTwgO5VSooPZP2tvCZZf8vdforpJRx+M= From: "blarsen at redhat dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug record/29721] [gdb, record, aarch64] FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-next third shr1 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:56:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: record X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: blarsen at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29721 --- Comment #2 from B. Larsen --- Running this test on Fedora 36 in aarch64, I only get 5 fails. Looking at t= he log: reverse-next^M 40 b[0] =3D 6; b[1] =3D 9; /* generic statement, end part = two */^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-next generic reverse-step^M 40 b[0] =3D 6; b[1] =3D 9; /* generic statement, end part = two */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step into solib function one reverse-step^M 38 b[1] =3D shr2(17); /* middle part two */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step within solib funct= ion one reverse-step^M shr2 (x=3D17) at /root/bld/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/shr= 2.c:23^M 23 }^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step back to main one reverse-step^M 22 return 2*x;^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step into solib function two reverse-step^M main () at /root/bld/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/sol= ib-reverse.c:38^M 38 b[1] =3D shr2(17); /* middle part two */^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-step within solib funct= ion two It seems that aarch64 is also experiencing https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28426 now, and x86 stopped experiencing it. While I agree that this should be fixed, I'm not sure 1f3e37e057e876b37db49dbd8ed5ca22c33f6772 is the actual culprit. I'll add th= is to my backlog, but it is pretty low priority, since testing in aarch64 is cumbersome for me, unfortunately. Also, if you are still seeing the failures with third, second and first shr1 with the cureent trunk, please post the relevant log here :-) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=