From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A7F943858C2B; Wed,  2 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A7F943858C2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1667397934;
	bh=W96G42Z2+Vl/xrnB8liiyDI4M/2gnqzfMP88y2ESkuk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xH1rsJhH0CN6BkHPelqvMKZLAwxVf0PQp9qQObUjzpknlI7xyjOUVFW4Th0i0ywFu
	 mLfwlNNGRmisWqRxQ1EOtcyZjcyi1rr4/4P7EsVxA5F1s16eTtUy0WFHGMg4PVjRSy
	 9gm7RqkKIcOWqPGwV26aI2DG6lxwu+qgb7fV1KHk=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug record/29721] [gdb, record, aarch64] FAIL:
 gdb.reverse/solib-precsave.exp: reverse-next third shr1
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: record
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29721-4717-rUK4l1KOh3@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29721-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29721-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29721

--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6)
> (In reply to B. Larsen from comment #4)
> > This looks like a completely different issue to what I found.=20
>=20
> Well, it looks like you ran into PR28426, which requires column info to
> reproduce.
>=20
> This PR is using gcc 7.5.0, which does not have column info by default.
>=20
> So, you could try -gno-column-info with your compiler, and perhaps that'll
> allow you to get past PR28426 and run into this PR.

Bruno, have you been able to reproduce ?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=