From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BEF3E395C05D; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:53:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BEF3E395C05D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1668624786; bh=48iN7JkUvvMh2FTLrXeKjJJPxrDQ1CJ9q5Fn9C8V7qI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eSDqTok9m9/FK+FslQ34xWlXFSc9zKJC8Q+CuMEwMB42INwslllnoG9pD7daMSJ2Y rsORWh8haQOdJd/gWnca58FSu5UU5QC/ZzWoIKZvRs/P/LxTvF6W4GQ2M15ui59WjJ 4DsIIGTZ/KeVDu+hecO9ds+wnrqNwdjfiJQSZfCU= From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/29793] [gdb/tdep, powerpc] FAIL: gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp: call a function that raises an exception without a handler. Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:53:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29793 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Carl E Love from comment #2) > I have been trying to work my way thru the list of GDB failures on > PowerPC for the last year+. Yes, I noticed, much appreciated :) > We have made good progress reducing the > number of failures on PowerPC. Agreed. If I run the testsuite and grep -v the gdb.reverse fails, there are not a lot of fails left. > I am trying to finish up a patch for=20 > gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp then OK, good to know. > I hope to get back to this bug and the issue with gdb.base/store.exp. Ack. I don't see the gdb.base/store.exp one though, could you file a PR for that? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=