From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6306D3854551; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:13:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6306D3854551
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1668802432;
	bh=rSmIawSYb44koNVOMqMbpch70xYE2C5DIpP8NNdGcE4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ytRfA2worp/1wQZ7anAe7bXfLr3N+LMyTx+qZe4RIsaCYH056a++hjo/4y7V3URs3
	 rpOZCE7OD+IWSOmkrc4hEIFeqhyIizFaMrbVt8xIWBduUipAyLuNfYlLYbRSNNQkKn
	 uIPRc3Kdp5Ztu5BNN7Joui+GGle2sd6ARKHiL9Tg=
From: "macro at orcam dot me.uk" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tdep/29804] [gdb/tdep, vax] Remove
 gdbarch_deprecated_function_start_offset
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:13:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: macro at orcam dot me.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29804-4717-EQYWuYLZoZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29804-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29804-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29804

--- Comment #5 from Maciej W. Rozycki <macro at orcam dot me.uk> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Maciej,
>=20
> I saw that when vax was announced to be deprecated as gcc target due to
> using cc0, you did the conversion from cc0 to MODE_CC.
>=20
> Are you able to test on vax?
>=20
> Are you willing to look into this PR?
My VAX box is up and running, however I note that we have no `gdbserver'
for VAX/NetBSD and I have no TCL/Expect/DejaGNU installed there.  Native
testing would take forever anyway.  Given that we do have NetBSD backends
in `gdbserver' already perhaps it'll be the easiest if we add support to
the VAX target there.  I'll see what I can do, but it may take a while.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=