From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 44328383B6B4; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:25:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 44328383B6B4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1670343947; bh=58cBQBA8PTpIF6pgC0KLFLFKVaZ2jYZleqFUV0slOUA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vsF+y8SX1jzkPJkM7LjX3RafaPTMlRePPBdTbFPn06i+23OIm3c91L30TD8JRrA+Y lXFPFoGqODE+anDCa701bHXA3vHWmxxuCqQcv6BuFnnj7y4fsf8AjbfWLzoFg7ukLI eWVxdjmyPssr5mHuxI7a9kJueAZrt6KqxUS9WHuw= From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/29804] [gdb/tdep, vax] Remove gdbarch_deprecated_function_start_offset Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:25:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29804 --- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3) > > If we had a VAX executable, would that be enough to > > test any proposed change? >=20 > I'm not sure I understand your question, possibly I'm missing some context > related to vax, but my understanding is that in order to test a potential > patch we'd need to be able to run the gdb testsuite on vax without and wi= th > the patch, to make sure we don't introduce regressions. Sorry, what I meant is that for a reasonably obscure target like this, and for a change that just affects some prologue skipping, it seems to me that we could test it with just an executable and by examining the effects of "break whatever". --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=