[Bug gdb/29850] [gdb, powerpc64le] FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: next over longjmp(1)

["vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29850

Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> > By inverting the branches:
> > ...
> > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.c
> > b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.c
> > index 4139e49e6f1..ce6990ca99a 100644
> > --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.c
> > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/longjmp.c
> > @@ -46,14 +46,14 @@ main ()
> >    volatile int i = 0;
> >  
> >    /* Pattern 1 - simple longjmp.  */
> > -  if (setjmp (env) == 0) /* patt1 */
> > +  if (setjmp (env) != 0) /* patt1 */
> >      {
> > -      longjmps++;
> > -      longjmp (env, 1);
> > +      resumes++;
> >      }
> >    else
> >      {
> > -      resumes++;
> > +      longjmps++;
> > +      longjmp (env, 1);
> >      }
> >  
> >    i = 1; /* miss_step_1 */
> > ...
> > we can avoid getting lucky on x86_64, and get the same result as for
> > powerpc64le.
> 
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;
> h=6e41445bb006f3afc784862f8eb1bf0f2691a94a

And now that that's fixed, x86_64 fails the same as powerpc64le, so marking
this a dup of PR26967.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 26967 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.