public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "filip.bascarevic at siemens dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/29865] New: The GDB dies during unwind the stack - question
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 15:24:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-29865-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865

            Bug ID: 29865
           Summary: The GDB dies during unwind the stack - question
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: filip.bascarevic at siemens dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Hello community,
I was debugging something and my GDB application just died when I wanted to do
"backtrace". After debugging the source code, I figure out the application died
at the assert in the file gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1147 (in the function
dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter()). The reason why the assert is triggered is
because I setup the backtrace limit to 30 and during unwinding the stack the
frame type was "INLINE_FRAME" so the get_priv_frame() function returned NULL
(see line gdb/frame.c:2527) and the assert is triggered. 
Is it really necessary to have this assert? Why we need to consider if the
current frame is "INLINE_FRAME" on this place? 

Problematic code is:
    while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
    {
      frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
      gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
    }

Thanks a lot for the support,
Filip Bascarevic

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-07 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07 15:24 filip.bascarevic at siemens dot com [this message]
2022-12-07 23:02 ` [Bug gdb/29865] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-12-08  7:55 ` filip.bascarevic at siemens dot com
2022-12-21 18:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-01-06 14:01 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-01-06 20:16 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-01-06 20:16 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-01-29 14:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 14:36 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-29865-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).