From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EB2383858D20; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 03:44:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EB2383858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1674963884; bh=ijpqrUUdhHCFxuTxYC9TMEJjST2l9VTNxXvC9s4P+To=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PRgQwtAh47zcaMCC6l1Acm80o1gUHeMQxBstpJcPRjIgVd5rMuIMrZPOY7lokw8N8 s0xN12yl/cT6IMruzPrYyL4EksWm6F4y4eFhnjZC4mz3BejDDngrk4pIFJHGH9A1jx R4DWvjdXmVbFbcsWaFsLkvsic1RivgY1HR87QDXc= From: "euloanty at live dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/29966] Cannot build anymore for win32 thread model of gdb Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 03:44:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: build X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: euloanty at live dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.1 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29966 --- Comment #61 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #58) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #54) > > i am not wasting anyone's time. I am just building the binutils-gdb wit= h the > > default settings. > >=20 > > NONONONOONONONONONONONONONON >=20 > > He is wrong >=20 > > I find quite funny why libstdc++ refuses to fix this [binutils] issue f= irst. >=20 > > jwakely it is all your fault. >=20 > You are wasting people's time, posting nonsense, not providing information > people ask for to help you and attack other people. Not just in this bug = but > in others. You have to immediately stop doing that or your will be blocked > from participating in bugzilla. I am not wasting people's time. I think the issue comes with libstdc++'s re= cent changes to threading and tz etc. However, he refuses to help investigate the issue. I cannot test the patch because I could not bootstrap a toolchain any more due to the bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=