From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 806FE3858C83; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:16:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 806FE3858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1674749764;
	bh=97QACI9xPrJ+Wp/UD2z1svfbA5SES3EV7aj9AgqnmFU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=boyvwlZaLsgeCavm9hki0iAOEJ7bLqo9GLiic8DSgAcfCeLt6SuZM8YAyQcwfw6ZR
	 4VRmkh/e2bevpyTZUi12KwhMMyTgTOuD/JcWOzkqbV3dkg/jkVxT21fFNi15G9aH0j
	 Zq3BDKNPshwnLow0EQMXmn9mHF/mnL3LM4vZdvks=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tdep/30021] [gdb/tdep, powerpc64le] previous frame inner to
 this frame (corrupt stack?)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:16:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30021-4717-hwzY7P8Ts1@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30021-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30021-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30021

--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Carl E Love from comment #8)
> I am seeing 11 new failures on our GDB build bot runs.  They appear to be
> due to the latest commit.  There appear to be a couple of issues fixed.=
=20=20
>=20
> 158 failures
> 11 new failures
> 3 old failures fixed
>=20
> +FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: pass=3D1: expect eof (GDB internal error)
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 6: bt 2
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 6: [string equal
> $fid $::main_fid]
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 6: up
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 7: bt 2
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 7: [string equal
> $fid $::main_fid]
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 7: up
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 8: $fba_value =
=3D=3D
> $::main_fba
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: bar: instruction 8: [string equal
> $fid $::main_fid]
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: foo: instruction 7: $fba_value =
=3D=3D
> $::main_fba
> +FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: foo: instruction 7: [string equal
> $fid $::main_fid]
> -FAIL: gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: pass=3D0: expect eof (GDB internal error)
> -FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: instruction 6: $fba_value =3D=3D
> $main_fba
> -FAIL: gdb.base/unwind-on-each-insn.exp: instruction 6: [string equal $fid
> $main_fid]

See also PR30049.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=