public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/30103] GDB gets confused about what is the current source file for various actions Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:58:04 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30103-4717-0gYHOtsSDD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30103-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30103 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=632652850db23bfec2499febe03c9ac4aa0b8dce commit 632652850db23bfec2499febe03c9ac4aa0b8dce Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Date: Fri Feb 10 15:58:00 2023 +0100 [gdb/testsuite] Fix linespec ambiguity in gdb.base/longjmp.exp PR testsuite/30103 reports the following failure on aarch64-linux (ubuntu 22.04): ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: next to longjmp next warning: Breakpoint address adjusted from 0x83dc305fef755015 to \ 0xffdc305fef755015. Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 0. Cannot access memory at address 0xffdc305fef755015 __libc_siglongjmp (env=0xaaaaaaab1018 <env>, val=1) at ./setjmp/longjmp.c:30 30 } (gdb) KFAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: gdb/26967 \ (PRMS: next over longjmp) delete breakpoints Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) info breakpoints No breakpoints or watchpoints. (gdb) break 63 No line 63 in the current file. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) n (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: setup: breakpoint \ at pattern start (got interactive prompt) ... The test-case intends to set the breakpoint on line number 63 in gdb.base/longjmp.c. It tries to do so by specifying "break 63", which specifies a line in the "current source file". Due to the KFAIL PR, gdb stopped in __libc_siglongjmp, and because of presence of debug info, the "current source file" becomes glibc's ./setjmp/longjmp.c. Consequently, setting the breakpoint fails. Fix this by adding a $subdir/$srcfile: prefix to the breakpoint linespecs. I've managed to reproduce the FAIL on x86_64/-m32, by installing the glibc-32bit-debuginfo package. This allowed me to confirm the "current source file" that is used: ... (gdb) KFAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 1: gdb/26967 \ (PRMS: next over longjmp) info source^M Current source file is ../setjmp/longjmp.c^M ... Tested on x86_64-linux, target boards unix/{-m64,-m32}. Reported-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR testsuite/30103 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30103 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 14:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-09 16:31 [Bug gdb/30103] New: " luis.machado at arm dot com 2023-02-09 16:32 ` [Bug gdb/30103] " luis.machado at arm dot com 2023-02-10 11:07 ` [Bug testsuite/30103] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-02-10 14:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-02-10 14:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30103-4717-0gYHOtsSDD@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).