public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug win32/30255] GDB on Windows cannot retrieve a stacktrace when a NULL function pointer is called
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:41:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30255-4717-Llp7WLzEDE@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30255-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30255

--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a0f6c61c9ab998cd77b0899a4bdea9576d6d775f

commit a0f6c61c9ab998cd77b0899a4bdea9576d6d775f
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 21 13:40:03 2023 -0600

    Handle unwinding from SEGV on Windows

    PR win32/30255 points out that a call to a NULL function pointer will
    leave gdb unable to "bt" on Windows.

    I tracked this down to the amd64 windows unwinder.  If we treat this
    scenario as if it were a leaf function, unwinding works fine.

    I'm not completely sure this patch is the best way.  I considered
    having it check for 'pc==0' -- but then I figured this could affect
    any inaccessible PC, not just the special 0 value.

    No test case because I can't run dejagnu tests on Windows.  I tested
    this by hand using the test case in the bug.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30255

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-10 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 17:30 [Bug gdb/30255] New: " luca.bacci at outlook dot com
2023-03-21 15:46 ` [Bug gdb/30255] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-21 15:54 ` [Bug win32/30255] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-21 16:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-21 18:30 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-21 19:43 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-21 20:22 ` luca.bacci at outlook dot com
2023-04-10 14:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-10 14:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-30255-4717-Llp7WLzEDE@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).