public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug exp/30271] Addresses of static thread_local fields are badly calculated sometimes
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:12:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30271-4717-NBrIifXvWB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30271-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Kind of weird DWARF here.  The only location for this
is given by:

 <1><82>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_variable)
    <83>   DW_AT_specification: <0x9f>
    <87>   DW_AT_location    : 10 byte block: e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e0     
(DW_OP_const8u: 0 0; DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address or DW_OP_HP_unknown)
    <92>   DW_AT_linkage_name: (indirect string, offset: 0x156):
_ZN9container8tlsvar_0E

It has a forward reference to its defining scope...

gdb currently deals with *backward* references like this by tracking
the DWARF scopes for DIE ranges.  This is needed because gdb's fast
scanner is "forward only", and DWARF provides no way to move up the DIE
tree.

Maybe we can also defer the processing of forward-referencing specifications.

Gosh I hate DWARF.  This stuff is all so needless -- it makes reader
implementation very difficult and provides zero benefit whatsoever.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-31 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-24 18:44 [Bug exp/30271] New: " michal.chojnowski at scylladb dot com
2023-03-25 16:37 ` [Bug exp/30271] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-25 16:38 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-25 20:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-26  0:56 ` michal.chojnowski at scylladb dot com
2023-03-26  1:21 ` michal.chojnowski at scylladb dot com
2023-03-31 17:04 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-31 17:12 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message]
2023-03-31 17:54 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-31 18:00 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-03-31 18:03 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-05-10 23:28 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-05-15 14:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 15:06 ` michal.chojnowski at scylladb dot com
2023-05-15 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 15:17 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-30271-4717-NBrIifXvWB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).