[Bug testsuite/30288] [gdb/cli, editing off] FAIL: gdb.base/trace-commands.exp: nested trace-commands test (pattern 2)

["cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30288

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=89447229c7961dd99d5167f2ebcc5d8973d5d5ae

commit 89447229c7961dd99d5167f2ebcc5d8973d5d5ae
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Fri Mar 31 17:15:37 2023 +0200

    [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/threadapply.exp with editing off

    With test-case gdb.threads/threadapply.exp and editing set to on, we have:
    ...
    (gdb) define remove^M
    Type commands for definition of "remove".^M
    End with a line saying just "end".^M
    >remove-inferiors 3^M
    >end^M
    (gdb)
    ...
    but with editing set to off, we run into:
    ...
    (gdb) define remove^M
    Type commands for definition of "remove".^M
    End with a line saying just "end".^M
    >remove-inferiors 3^M
    end^M
    >(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/threadapply.exp: thread_set=all: try remove: \
      define remove (timeout)
    ...

    The commands are issued by this test:
    ...
            gdb_define_cmd "remove" {
                "remove-inferiors 3"
            }
    ...
    which does:
    - gdb_test_multiple "define remove", followed by
    - gdb_test_multiple "remove-inferiors 3\nend".

    Proc gdb_test_multiple has special handling for multi-line commands, which
    splits it up into subcommands, and for each subcommand issues it and then
    waits for the resulting prompt (the secondary prompt ">" for all but the
last
    subcommand).

    However, that doesn't work as expected in this case because the initial
    gdb_test_multiple "define remove" fails to match all resulting output, and
    consequently the secondary prompt resulting from "define remove" is counted
as
    if it was the one resulting from "remove-inferiors 3".

    Fix this by matching the entire output of "define remove", including the
    secondary prompt.

    Tested on x86_64-linux.

    PR testsuite/30288
    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30288

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.