* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-06-05 15:15 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-06-05 15:40 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-06-05 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
It occurs to me that this could also happen with the "target"
command, and for that one, "&" isn't implemented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-06-05 15:15 ` [Bug dap/30472] " tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-06-05 15:40 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-07-27 19:43 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-06-05 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
See bug#7251. Bug #7253 is also maybe relevant.
Maybe it would be enough to use send_gdb and then
have any output from the command be sent as output
events, not in the response. Then the reader thread
could accept interrupt requests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-06-05 15:15 ` [Bug dap/30472] " tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-06-05 15:40 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-07-27 19:43 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-11-06 21:19 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-07-27 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Most of the problem could be solved by noticing when
the inferior continues and telling the DAP response that
it is done.
This wouldn't help with the "target" problem though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-27 19:43 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-11-06 21:19 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-11-06 21:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-06 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I realized somewhat belatedly that this problem also
affects evaluation of expressions that involve an
inferior call. These can't be handled by changing
how the output is directed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-06 21:19 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-11-06 21:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-11-07 14:11 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-06 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I was thinking this could be handled by implementing cancellation,
but that will give weird results when used to interrupt an
inferior call. Like, I suppose it would work, but the inferior
will be left in a somewhat weird state.
Also it seems a little strange to use cancellation to interrupt
a gdb CLI "continue" but not a DAP "continue".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-06 21:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-11-07 14:11 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-11-16 20:58 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-07 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
> Also it seems a little strange to use cancellation to interrupt
> a gdb CLI "continue" but not a DAP "continue".
I go back and forth on this, but I suppose the difference is
that a repl evaluation of "continue" won't return a result,
so cancel would be correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 14:11 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-11-16 20:58 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-12-01 15:41 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-11-16 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |tromey at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I'm working on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-16 20:58 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-12-01 15:41 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2023-12-11 18:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-11 18:55 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-12-01 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-December/204689.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-01 15:41 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-12-11 18:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-11 18:55 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-11 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c79c8dad90e4382100b51694a2b9ee7e913a04a
commit 1c79c8dad90e4382100b51694a2b9ee7e913a04a
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date: Tue Nov 7 10:56:07 2023 -0700
Implement DAP cancellation
This implements DAP cancellation. A new object is introduced that
handles the details of cancellation. While cancellation is inherently
racy, this code attempts to make it so that gdb doesn't inadvertently
cancel the wrong request.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Reviewed-By: Kévin Le Gouguec <legouguec@adacore.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug dap/30472] DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive
2023-05-19 15:06 [Bug dap/30472] New: DAP "repl" evaluation can make gdb unresponsive tromey at sourceware dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-11 18:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-11 18:55 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-12-11 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |15.1
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread