From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D2BDB3857B9B; Wed,  7 Jun 2023 23:57:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D2BDB3857B9B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1686182232;
	bh=gRR0SirwW4HeaaUcg/oh7bfwkzkbY34JSv4+TMYjzNc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SWXr/GmpJBVGLzj/NB7TfVLEQJZKTJYD/F+iYtO6R9zzUElfxs/xP615/Y32zvQ1W
	 W5JEQe9tZvPYGyFR9rVsyBonFjx5Ov6jRfe/qgEBWkBqATC1CVBQqYpBekBQoWj/IS
	 nonwKAX0YouZI8vzs+YIr6jD+xqPQOia7vGdsONw=
From: "mattst88 at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/30525] gdb cannot read shared libraries on SPARC64
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 23:57:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mattst88 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pedro at palves dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30525-4717-EGk7vzxXCz@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30525-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30525-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30525

--- Comment #10 from Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #9)
> Created attachment 14925 [details]
> [PATCH] Avoid pread64/pwrite64 for high memory addresses (v3)
>=20
> > This patch does not fix it.
>=20
> Hmm, scary, but...
>=20
> I meanwhile found a sparc64 linux box on the GCC compile farm and was able
> to play with it.
>=20
> And, err, it's just that I had the logic reversed in the patch...  :-P

Hah, that's why we test :)

> The corrected version of the patch works for me, which is a big relief.
>=20
> Could you give it a try too, just in case?

It works! Thanks a bunch.

> I'll see about running the whole GDB testsuite.

Thanks. From the outside, it seems surprising that GDB and binutils don't h=
ave
some kind of CI system that could catch regressions like this.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=