From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4E2993858C1F; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 22:11:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E2993858C1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1686175878; bh=uEJVAD21+ewDiNAMP0ApOyAp0P26nhN+Mb5NK4M9pbQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZZ+hFLjcOmM4ONMQKrS2Y+g2cVlcjQs8QCb2LMiAAJHKV3KEO4tz5k3UkiZw09wHh 1wtgfkJB8nyQ2QBg00+C0UOWTpLo9oCq/5aIRlXlcQV4YPdi1t4nOX2vI8LMJ4BriR fBbCT12vxZfu9OrcjsRMts1tCdjXK/GaxuHDhMOw= From: "pedro at palves dot net" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/30525] gdb cannot read shared libraries on SPARC64 Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 22:11:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pedro at palves dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pedro at palves dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete assigned_to cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30525 Pedro Alves changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #14922|0 |1 is obsolete| | Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |pedro at palves dot= net Last reconfirmed| |2023-06-07 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Pedro Alves --- Created attachment 14925 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D14925&action=3Ded= it [PATCH] Avoid pread64/pwrite64 for high memory addresses > This patch does not fix it. Hmm, scary, but... I meanwhile found a sparc64 linux box on the GCC compile farm and was able = to play with it. And, err, it's just that I had the logic reversed in the patch... :-P The corrected version of the patch works for me, which is a big relief. Could you give it a try too, just in case? I'll see about running the whole GDB testsuite. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=