public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/30547] [gdb, s390x, ppc64] segfault in for_each_block Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:31:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30547-4717-ZnjH0wBMi1@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30547-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30547 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f9582a22dba747ff0905f4c1a80d84f677eeb928 commit f9582a22dba747ff0905f4c1a80d84f677eeb928 Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Date: Tue Nov 28 10:31:25 2023 +0100 [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1 When running test-case gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp on powerpc64 (likewise on s390x), I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp: \ exec_file=vfork-follow-parent-exit: target-non-stop=on: non-stop=off: \ resolution_method=schedule-multiple: print unblock_parent = 1 continue^M Continuing.^M Reading symbols from vfork-follow-parent-exit...^M ^M ^M Fatal signal: Segmentation fault^M ----- Backtrace -----^M 0x1027d3e7 gdb_internal_backtrace_1^M src/gdb/bt-utils.c:122^M 0x1027d54f _Z22gdb_internal_backtracev^M src/gdb/bt-utils.c:168^M 0x1057643f handle_fatal_signal^M src/gdb/event-top.c:889^M 0x10576677 handle_sigsegv^M src/gdb/event-top.c:962^M 0x3fffa7610477 ???^M 0x103f2144 for_each_block^M src/gdb/dcache.c:199^M 0x103f235b _Z17dcache_invalidateP13dcache_struct^M src/gdb/dcache.c:251^M 0x10bde8c7 _Z24target_dcache_invalidatev^M src/gdb/target-dcache.c:50^M ... or similar. The root cause for the segmentation fault is that linux_is_uclinux gives an incorrect result: it should always return false, given that we're running on a regular linux system, but instead it returns first true, then false. In more detail, the segmentation fault happens as follows: - a program space with an address space is created - a second program space is about to be created. maybe_new_address_space is called, and because linux_is_uclinux returns true, maybe_new_address_space returns false, and no new address space is created - a second program space with the same address space is created - a program space is deleted. Because linux_is_uclinux now returns false, gdbarch_has_shared_address_space (current_inferior ()->arch ()) returns false, and the address space is deleted - when gdb uses the address space of the remaining program space, we run into the segfault, because the address space is deleted. Hardcoding linux_is_uclinux to false makes the test-case pass. We leave addressing the root cause for the following commit in this series. For now, prevent the segmentation fault by making the address space a refcounted object. This was already suggested here [1]: ... A better solution might be to have the address spaces be reference counted ... Tested on top of trunk on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux. Tested on top of gdb-14-branch on ppc64-linux. Co-Authored-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> PR gdb/30547 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30547 [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-October/202928.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-28 9:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-13 13:16 [Bug gdb/30547] New: [gdb, s390x] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 8:02 ` [Bug gdb/30547] [gdb, s390x, ppc64] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 8:28 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-31 15:53 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-01 9:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-01 9:56 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-02 10:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-04 15:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-28 9:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-11-28 9:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-28 9:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30547-4717-ZnjH0wBMi1@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).