From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EC8823858D38; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:19:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC8823858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1686665975; bh=oHpnualxXzooQZ6+yDTkvC0VO8Og87oYwOow/zQrQYg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=BKapn8Ly1Tf7EdMnj/RY7gac+stDSQdoAYQu99UZoj5u5DrFFes/8nHYCTYrNOR03 Cyjlr/ceR3k4v+FWdFXZzZNMiUWz1/qyeH2mb96Y6DmGd2VaIlVYD3BCi3XzCgO2vw 1jXxXtibR9sWyeenBwDdfcf6Ej/8psZPgcrK+omg= From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/30548] New: [gdb, ppc64le, s390x] FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:19:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30548 Bug ID: 30548 Summary: [gdb, ppc64le, s390x] FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5 Product: gdb Version: HEAD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdb Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I'm running into these FAILs with ppc64le and s390x: ... FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backtrace w= hen the unwind is broken at frame 5 FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 3: backtrace w= hen the unwind is broken at frame 3 FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 1: backtrace w= hen the unwind is broken at frame 1 ... First in more detail: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: maint flush register-cache bt^M #0 inline_func () at /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:49^M #1 normal_func () at /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32^M #2 0x0000000010000734 in inline_func () at /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:45^M #3 normal_func () at /home/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.c:32^M register has not been saved in frame^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: backt= race when the unwind is broken at frame 5 ... Fails quite consistently, from SLE-12 to Tumbleweed: ... $ find tmp-qa-remote/ -name "*.sum" | xargs grep -c "FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp" | grep -v :0 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-15.s390x/gdb-testresults/gdb-s390x-sus= e-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-15.s390x/gdb-testresults/gdb-s390x-sus= e-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.4.s390x/gdb-testresults/g= db-s390x-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.4.s390x/gdb-testresults/g= db-s390x-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_PPC.ppc64le/gdb-testresul= ts/gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_PPC.ppc64le/gdb-testresul= ts/gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_ARM.armv7l/gdb-testresult= s/gdb-armv7hl-suse-linux.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_ARM.armv7l/gdb-testresult= s/gdb-armv7hl-suse-linux.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-15.ppc64le/gdb-testresults/gdb-ppc64le= -suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-15.ppc64le/gdb-testresults/gdb-ppc64le= -suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_zSystems.s390x/gdb-testre= sults/gdb-s390x-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Factory_zSystems.s390x/gdb-testre= sults/gdb-s390x-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.3.ppc64le/gdb-testresults= /gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.3.ppc64le/gdb-testresults= /gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.4.ppc64le/gdb-testresults= /gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.4.ppc64le/gdb-testresults= /gdb-ppc64le-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-12.ppc64le/gdb-testresults/gdb-ppc64le= -suse-linux-m64.-fPIE.-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-12.ppc64le/gdb-testresults/gdb-ppc64le= -suse-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-12.s390x/gdb-testresults/gdb-s390x-sus= e-linux-m64.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.SLE-12.s390x/gdb-testresults/gdb-s390x-sus= e-linux-m64.-fPIE.-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.3.s390x/gdb-testresults/g= db-s390x-suse-linux-m64.-fno-PIE.-no-pie.sum:3 tmp-qa-remote/binaries-testsuite.openSUSE_Leap_15.3.s390x/gdb-testresults/g= db-s390x-suse-linux-m64.sum:3 ... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=