From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4A1613858C53; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:12:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A1613858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1689891174; bh=smRB3weZRYlsqpJNRc9RA/foG7bpsF7p7PYKI9Q69Pw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kmWWv+pfEdui0c6FOiYVFSeJJkyXbW5NJanDDshYjAKZaOhJi6D2vZV6aCtEn3N+N QeyHFH1YYAQ4oR64AtIIzuFee/B/L8AOttUgtQpTvgsMGxgDEcgyVCEp/SUecYDOvu 0xoUrBSblWaiiyHwF2kvVqjpLt0PMGY4kQz23IbA= From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/30651] GDB crash on _BitInt debuginfo Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:12:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30651 --- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Yeah. I've filed https://dwarfstd.org/issues/230529.1.html proposal for > DWARF6, but it hasn't been discussed yet. And, while GDB can print some > _BitInt values just fine (seems if they are multiple of 64 bits, it gives= up > on others. Right now when debugging stuff I'm just printing the limbs us= ing > x/gx &var when GDB can't handle it. It looks like there are new suffixes too? And the semantics of these aren't identical to existing int types? And I guess new ABI... probably will end up wanting several gdb bugs to implement it all. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=