public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug symtab/30728] [gdb/symtab, cc-with-dwz] FAIL: gdb.cp/breakpoint-locs.exp: break N1::C1::baz Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:47:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-30728-4717-1KBiPlDIOi@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30728-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30728 --- Comment #14 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> --- I finally looked into this a bit. I think that for inline functions specifically, what gdb should do is track all the CUs that include a particular CU. Then if an inline function is found in an included CU, all including CUs should be expanded. It's unclear to me if any other tags need this treatment. Making it more targeted would mean that other requests would be faster, due to less CU expansion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 0:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-08-06 15:50 [Bug symtab/30728] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-06 16:16 ` [Bug symtab/30728] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-06 16:31 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-06 18:15 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-06 22:00 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-07 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-07 10:44 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-07 15:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-07 16:35 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2023-08-08 23:32 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-09 15:31 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-10 8:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-25 15:56 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-02 12:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-29 15:08 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-15 0:47 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message] 2024-01-15 1:34 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-01-15 1:54 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-02-09 19:48 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-02-16 2:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org 2024-05-06 13:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-30728-4717-1KBiPlDIOi@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).