From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1294B3858D35; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:24:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1294B3858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1694179489; bh=X82n2th9IAphwq1IiTvJCghZFLGOPykZMDoq6EI1QRM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ufgSOAhAVK6JCWBtMmwwU1+F0BZw1BmBhBbQJt3Tx5TJPutFR5x86O3GaxlBtbBrs u32z4t7g5wb42xgdWQyd3YsNf96KxulaWQzLlau1qfaaIdDo8UoTWQm2e38M72sFge oHRuCGJ27T15rv3ezjaY+sLTx8YMlTK9iB0wGPxQ= From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug symtab/30829] [gdb/symtab] Review write_gdbindex for dwz Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:24:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30829 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > > However, in this test-case the .gnu_debugaltlink file contains a CU. >=20 > Hmm, something else is going on here. >=20 > I changed the CU to a PU, and the test started to fail with target board > unix, as I expected. However, it didn't fail with the cc-with-index-cache > target board, while it should. >=20 > A PU is just a dwarf repository that has significance only in terms of the > CUs that reference and/or import it. An unreferenced PU should be ignore= d. Sorry, scrap that, that was an artifact of not yet having implemented clean= ing up the cache dir in the new target board. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=