[Bug gdb/31152] Formalise unintened functionality in version 9.1

["chris_douglas_email at yahoo dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31152

--- Comment #5 from stephen douglas <chris_douglas_email at yahoo dot com> ---
As I stated in my initial post, my hobby is repurposing old tech. I look at the
box as a set of peripherals with a processor in the middle costing a lot less
than the cards for a PC (usually less than 10%). I write to the manufacturer,
and if they consider the box obsolete, they usually tell you what they have
done to prevent “piracy” if you sign an NDA. I then offer to either remove the
comments from anything developed using information in the NDA and then change
meaningful names to gobbledygook (a secure password generator is usually good)
OR publish the .S of the .c. If we are both happy with this I sign the NDA. I
then use gdb to sort out anything I miss. I cleared “encrypted” to describe
what they do to file descriptors but the details are subject to the NDA. I have
an unexplained change in my glibc source to increase the size of the
constant(s) FD_SETSIZE is generated from so it copes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.