From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 14A3F3858C52; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 20:12:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 14A3F3858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1703967163; bh=AKUuO6vkXNuwMuuxGrujvvsIl3Z10xPQtiVD9PPZlAU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PXTdsZpGhpMpX6X1CwVsX6MOR7HJCSpwAotApWfb+OQt1cO/pRHY7x4PuVnrBKzrT R2vMKAVoAxUgp9+MyJ3aPl1MiJZG5gBdZJnQbV27mAH77wCZ3HqPpA6a4/vKlbdByd yNMcVEt8LxubCLaMOsp8A+3QyK7dxuvYxsaWlqGw= From: "chris_douglas_email at yahoo dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/31152] Formalise unintened functionality in version 9.1 Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 20:12:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: chris_douglas_email at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31152 --- Comment #5 from stephen douglas = --- As I stated in my initial post, my hobby is repurposing old tech. I look at= the box as a set of peripherals with a processor in the middle costing a lot le= ss than the cards for a PC (usually less than 10%). I write to the manufacture= r, and if they consider the box obsolete, they usually tell you what they have done to prevent =E2=80=9Cpiracy=E2=80=9D if you sign an NDA. I then offer t= o either remove the comments from anything developed using information in the NDA and then chan= ge meaningful names to gobbledygook (a secure password generator is usually go= od) OR publish the .S of the .c. If we are both happy with this I sign the NDA.= I then use gdb to sort out anything I miss. I cleared =E2=80=9Cencrypted=E2= =80=9D to describe what they do to file descriptors but the details are subject to the NDA. I = have an unexplained change in my glibc source to increase the size of the constant(s) FD_SETSIZE is generated from so it copes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=