public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/31254] [gdb, arm] FAIL: gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp: up 10 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:55:55 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-31254-4717-oilH9WAyHw@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-31254-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31254 --- Comment #15 from Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org> --- Created attachment 15326 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15326&action=edit debug frame log - failing backtrace And here is the log file from a session where it fails. One thing I noticed while looking into this today is that if I comment out the "arm exidx" unwinder, then I can't reproduce the problem anymore. And indeed, looking at this failing backtrace it was used to unwind a few frames, while in the good backtrace it wasn't used in any frame. I'll dig more into this tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 2:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-01-17 16:07 [Bug gdb/31254] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:08 ` [Bug gdb/31254] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:08 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:12 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:19 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-17 16:23 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 16:37 ` luis.machado at arm dot com 2024-01-17 16:37 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-17 16:44 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-18 17:12 ` adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot org 2024-01-18 17:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-18 19:15 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-18 19:54 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-19 10:32 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-19 10:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-24 2:51 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-01-24 2:55 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org [this message] 2024-01-31 4:03 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-02-01 3:24 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-02-01 10:04 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-01 10:10 ` luis.machado at arm dot com 2024-02-01 18:32 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-02-01 20:28 ` tdevries at suse dot de 2024-02-02 1:39 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-02-03 3:26 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org 2024-02-05 5:56 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 10:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-05 10:05 ` [Bug tdep/31254] [gdb/tdep, " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-06 21:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-06 21:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-07 8:00 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-31254-4717-oilH9WAyHw@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).