From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C59A73858C5F; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:24:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C59A73858C5F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1707402280; bh=SdlEZP3eACWeEC89/iEkkEcV+wV7o52xt9CmQRvSuI8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eqWkr/hGz2PVEDqplFwZA4+STbS12QuRI0QJ6AZ1jx4TW3K8rqz9Wji7ECsNT+7jF J31g+Vzw3VyzrZfEYkQJoxhDUg5zdmAhfeZOiaxU0T5fgOz5EYEuMvKSUDZ/3KJQSy bIQES+cPo2UZj3BEPk7xTFDOZOh/ZEJ+N+f5+LFI= From: "luis.machado at arm dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/31278] GDB on arm-linux-gnueabihf fails gdb.reverse/func-map-to-same-line.exp Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 14:24:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: luis.machado at arm dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31278 Luis Machado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luis.machado at arm dot com --- Comment #4 from Luis Machado --- Yes, the thumb situation in 32-bit Arm is a bit delicate. Various things ha= ve not been well thought out with this metadata in mind. For instance, probes don't carry any thumb information, stripped binaries sometimes lack the information. Is the specific problem with this testcase that the line table PC processin= g is getting confused with the LSB bit set? Or is it not stepping backwards correctly because of thumbness? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=