public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/31312] attach-many-short-lived-threads gives inconsistent results
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 16:43:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31312-4717-O3zy7ehXWC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31312-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31312

--- Comment #14 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Carl E Love from comment #13)
> There are some timing
> issues that can cause the kernel to legitimately return EPERM.  He pointed
> me to the ptrace Linux man page

Ugh :}  Disappointing but what can we really do about it, I suppose.
I guess if the race happens more for you, all we can conclude is
that Power 10 is just too darn fast.

 Another possible cause for the EPERM is if
> ptrace is already connected to the process.  I tried to determine if this
> was in fact the case.  Specifically if the detach hadn't completed yet but
> was not able to show that was the failure case.  

Yeah, I was wondering about this as a theory for why subsequent
attempts all fail.  I probably distracted us a bit by ranting but
IIUC this part still isn't understood.  Could you maybe verify
that gdb thinks it has detached all the threads it attached to?
If so and the bug persists, I think we can just write it off
as another kernel bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-09 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29 18:06 [Bug testsuite/31312] New: " cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-01-29 18:08 ` [Bug testsuite/31312] " cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-01-29 18:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-01-29 20:55 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 21:35 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-01-29 21:44 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-01-29 22:38 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-01-30  7:21 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-30 10:13 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-31 16:14 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-02-06 18:59 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-02-12 18:58 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-12 18:59 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-02-16  4:42 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-03-09  0:45 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-09  1:29 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-03-09  6:59 ` brobecker at gnat dot com
2024-03-09 16:43 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message]
2024-03-15 16:41 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-03-15 21:57 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-03-16  1:37 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-03-16 17:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-18 18:45 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-03-19 15:14 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-03-19 15:35 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-03-19 15:57 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-03-19 19:10 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-03-21 23:17 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-04-14 17:56 ` brobecker at gnat dot com
2024-04-16  4:56 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-04-17 14:52 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-04-30  2:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-10 22:14 ` brobecker at gnat dot com
2024-05-10 22:28 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-11 23:48 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2024-05-13 19:03 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-05-14 15:24 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-17 16:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-05-17 16:33 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-17 17:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17 19:54 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-17 19:58 ` pedro at palves dot net
2024-05-17 23:02 ` cel at linux dot ibm.com
2024-05-20 20:05 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31312-4717-O3zy7ehXWC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).