public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug python/31437] [gdb/python] Unavailable register breaks python unwinding
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 12:12:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31437-4717-LMxO3ctSSp@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31437-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31437

--- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2236c5e384de20b0dd6b2fbc964a7269027cb2d9

commit 2236c5e384de20b0dd6b2fbc964a7269027cb2d9
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Wed May 8 14:13:11 2024 +0200

    [gdb/python] Make gdb.UnwindInfo.add_saved_register more robust

    On arm-linux, until commit bbb12eb9c84 ("gdb/arm: Remove tpidruro register
    from non-FreeBSD target descriptions") I ran into:
    ...
    FAIL: gdb.base/inline-frame-cycle-unwind.exp: cycle at level 5: \
      backtrace when the unwind is broken at frame 5
    ...

    What happens is the following:
    - the TestUnwinder from inline-frame-cycle-unwind.py calls
      gdb.UnwindInfo.add_saved_register with reg == tpidruro and value
      "<unavailable>",
    - pyuw_sniffer calls value->contents ().data () to access the value of the
      register, which throws an UNAVAILABLE_ERROR,
    - this causes the TestUnwinder unwinder to fail, after which another
unwinder
      succeeds and returns the correct frame, and
    - the test-case fails because it's counting on the TestUnwinder to succeed
and
      return an incorrect frame.

    Fix this by checking for !value::entirely_available as well as
    valued::optimized_out in unwind_infopy_add_saved_register.

    Tested on x86_64-linux and arm-linux.

    Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>

    PR python/31437
    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31437

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 12:24 [Bug python/31437] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-01 12:27 ` [Bug python/31437] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-02  8:52 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-02 12:37 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-19  9:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-08  8:36 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-08 12:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-05-08 12:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-08 12:15 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31437-4717-LMxO3ctSSp@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).