[Bug mi/31448] [Feature Request] Register's bitfields MI Commands

["robert.pirvu at cyberthorstudios dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31448

--- Comment #2 from Robert Pîrvu <robert.pirvu at cyberthorstudios dot com> ---
Register View uses two MI Commands to populate the view with registers. One
command which returns the names of the registers, and another which returns the
positions and values of the registers. I wanted to have a bit of consistency
with the commands and that is why I proposed to have something similar, one
command to return the names of bitfields and one for the values. And it will be
a lot easier for this to work with the existing parsers used by the Register
View.

Maybe instead of implementing a new command for getting the bitfield's names,
we can use the same approach by adding a --with-bitfields option to the
-data-list-register-name MI Command. It might be better than having to create a
new MI Command which will be used only in this case.

And I forgot to mention this, in case the register doesn't have bitfields, then
the bitfields list will be empty.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.