public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/31463] Artificial variables in locals output
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:14:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31463-4717-qRIyw0PZcZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31463-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31463
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Neverov from comment #1)
> I don't know if range-loop variables are shown by design or not.
Normally gdb just does what the compiler tells it.
Ada is a bit special because it emits some forms of debuginfo
via symbol names. By default there isn't much of this any
more, but there are still a few cases that can't be avoided.
It would be fine by me to give Python a way to detect artificiality.
Omitting artificial variables via some option would also be fine.
I suppose my view is that, overall, seeing these isn't too confusing,
and might be helpful in some cases when debugging. It lets you
inspect a compiler transform and see some objects that would otherwise
be inaccessible -- like if you want to debug some iterator implementation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 9:54 [Bug gdb/31463] New: " dmitry.neverov at jetbrains dot com
2024-03-08 9:55 ` [Bug gdb/31463] " sam at gentoo dot org
2024-03-08 11:44 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2024-03-08 13:38 ` dmitry.neverov at jetbrains dot com
2024-03-08 16:14 ` tromey at sourceware dot org [this message]
2025-01-02 18:59 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2025-01-02 20:41 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-31463-4717-qRIyw0PZcZ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).