From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6D7E73858410; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:58:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D7E73858410 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1714449505; bh=j2uohF6wyEkrgjX25RVSczHIaWM24kjV3aslb7eA9r4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tDvmErsnFsCNF9a3C+pKLY/hIOroLuS/ZyffjB1yNC8ocHQRMurWg4+sP8M+lTfpV J8YbkfRHh/XCkeXWv0lf8tVloJrLIG27bnd4nonJcywKoYRqbIjhryACjHhmWtWhKO 7q3eW2bWl1ho/1PlRaM1mWwOOhGD65qzrJu49S1Y= From: "thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/31484] [gdb/testsuite] Add memcpy, memmove, memset watchpoint tests Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 03:58:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31484 --- Comment #12 from Thiago Jung Bauermann --- (In reply to Sourceware Commits from comment #11) > The master branch has been updated by Thiago Bauermann > : >=20 > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git; > h=3D6b4b601b35a0aaf2b8b5db8e5793302736504171 >=20 > commit 6b4b601b35a0aaf2b8b5db8e5793302736504171 > Author: Thiago Jung Bauermann > Date: Thu Apr 18 23:24:55 2024 -0300 >=20 > gdb/testsuite: Add gdb.base/memops-watchpoint.exp Thanks to Kevin, I believe this bugzilla is now done. But if Tom or Luis ha= ve any any additional suggestions, I'd be happy to extend or modify the testca= se. There's still the AArch64-specific #31666, for which I'm getting asymptotic= ally close to posting patches. > Approved-by: Kevin Buettner --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=