From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 983E23858D20; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:26:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 983E23858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1711664818;
	bh=CIa7wuoU1gUhiUlU51UfuKA7yX1lTi76fEbsJqnLuC0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BGKsLueH++HmuaSIuszRqcMgpJA8SGBeiUez0ZY/+Z6L9g0DPSR7NYL5P7kRsSrS8
	 g1nL1rjNkgYCYwVufqMABRN30Q9okpWD++wPtHLQBaOQDW+OPZywSDArPLnMusfadO
	 5tSNPnZDoVRj9Jv+w1aPHZ6fNz1QKFWJE4nl16us=
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tui/31522] TUI misses highlight after run to main
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:26:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: tui
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.1
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-31522-4717-rcnEg6wNWT@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-31522-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-31522-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31522

--- Comment #14 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #3)

> > This seems reasonable to me, but maybe it is a change if
> > you exit the TUI and then re-enter it in some scenario.
> > Personally I'm not too concerned about this.
>=20
> I do that frequently with c-x,a.  I'll be debugging gdb, and
> stepping/nexting with the TUI enabled, then decide I'm at the right spot =
the
> program that I want to inspect variables or run a command [...]

What I meant here is that I was wondering if there are cases
where "tui disable" + "tui enable" would preserve the state of
the source window, even if there were changes (like stepping,
whatever) in between.

I tend to think that it is fine for "tui enable" to just recenter
the selected frame's line -- but is that ok with you?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=