public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/32564] New: [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution
@ 2025-01-16 12:22 vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:23 ` [Bug testsuite/32564] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:46 ` guinevere at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2025-01-16 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32564
Bug ID: 32564
Summary: [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in
gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward
execution
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
While working on PR32561 I noticed that the test-case essentially contains a
list of assertions about register/memory state at certain lines, which are
checked for backward execution, but not for forward execution.
Consequently, in case of failure it's hard to determine whether there's a
problem with backward execution or not.
This may apply to more test-cases.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/32564] [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution
2025-01-16 12:22 [Bug testsuite/32564] New: [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2025-01-16 12:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:46 ` guinevere at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2025-01-16 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32564
Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |guinevere at redhat dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/32564] [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution
2025-01-16 12:22 [Bug testsuite/32564] New: [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:23 ` [Bug testsuite/32564] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2025-01-16 12:46 ` guinevere at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: guinevere at redhat dot com @ 2025-01-16 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32564
--- Comment #1 from Guinevere Larsen <guinevere at redhat dot com> ---
That's a good point. We could maybe do something akin to
gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.exp, which would make it faster to write new tests as
well
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-16 12:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-16 12:22 [Bug testsuite/32564] New: [gdb/testsuite] Check assertions in gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp also for forward execution vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:23 ` [Bug testsuite/32564] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2025-01-16 12:46 ` guinevere at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).