From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23020 invoked by alias); 29 May 2014 18:35:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22844 invoked by uid 55); 29 May 2014 18:34:59 -0000 From: "brobecker at adacore dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug breakpoints/7143] Watchpoint does not trigger when first set Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 18:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: breakpoints X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brobecker at adacore dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.8 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q2/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7143 --- Comment #17 from brobecker at adacore dot com --- > This is the sort of thing that'd be fixed if software > single-step breakpoints were in the generic global location > list framework, but, they're not. > > I guess the simplest is to do something like: I am testing a patch on AIX as we speak. Mine is based on the same principles, but avoids inserting it in the first place. I'd like to run the patch on Linux as well. I will do one run in normal mode, without software single-step. But ISTR that you implemented SSS for x86_64-linux as well? If possible, I can also do a run to compare SSS results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.