public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/7946] Doco 'jump'  vs '$pc = ..., $npc = ....'
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:59:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-7946-4717-BibhwxBp11@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-7946-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7946

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Burgess <aburgess@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0d42948f0c822ed3782a45771c8fbc21aa2d6553

commit 0d42948f0c822ed3782a45771c8fbc21aa2d6553
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 24 15:27:27 2023 +0100

    gdb/doc: extend the documentation of the jump command

    This commit addresses PR gdb/7946.  While checking for bugs relating
    to the jump command I noticed a long standing bug that points out a
    deficiency with GDB's documentation of the jump command.

    The bug points out that 'jump 0x...' is not always the same as 'set
    $pc = 0x...' and then 'continue'.  Writing directly to the $pc
    register does not update any auxiliary state, e.g. $npc on SPARC,
    while using 'jump' does.

    It felt like this would be an easy issue to address by adding a
    paragraph to the docs, so I took a stab at writing something suitable.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7946

    Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

       reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-7946-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2023-04-27 12:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-27 13:01 ` aburgess at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-7946-4717-BibhwxBp11@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).