From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-16580-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12193 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2014 03:23:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 12162 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2014 03:23:38 -0000
From: "sergiodj at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug backtrace/8772] [regression] backtraces include many invalid
 frames when debugging stripped executables
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 03:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: backtrace
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: sergiodj at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-8772-4717-0MCr47s1D5@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-8772-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-8772-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00569.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8772

Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |sergiodj at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |OBSOLETE

--- Comment #1 from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> ---
I cannot reproduce this on my system.  This is what I get:

#0  0x00000000004004f5 in ?? ()
#1  0x00000032c4021d65 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000000000400429 in ?? ()

Which I think it is pretty OK for a stripped binary.  Closing this as OBSOLETE.
 Feel free to reopen if it is still valid.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.