[Bug cli/8822] log commands along with their output (make logging more flexible)

["vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8822

--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #8)
> I was going to suggest trace-commands today, but I see it's been done.
> I wonder if a new logging mode could print the prompt and the
> command instead of the "+".

Using this:
...
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
index 5f81db418bc..6a59607aa47 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
@@ -495,8 +495,13 @@ print_command_trace (const char *fmt, ...)
   if (!source_verbose && !trace_commands)
     return;

-  for (i=0; i < command_nest_depth; i++)
-    gdb_printf ("+");
+  if (0)
+    {
+      for (i=0; i < command_nest_depth; i++)
+       gdb_printf ("+");
+    }
+  else
+    gdb_printf ("%s", get_prompt ().c_str ());

   va_list args;

...
I get:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set trace-commands on" -ex "inferior" -ex "set prompt
(bla) " -ex "inferior"
(gdb) inferior
[Current inferior is 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
(gdb) set prompt (bla) 
(bla) inferior
[Current inferior is 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)]
...

Doesn't take into account annotations though, for that we need top_level_prompt
instead.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.