From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27705 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2002 16:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-testresults-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-testresults-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27532 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2002 16:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2002 16:04:15 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1IG4Cc01118; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:04:12 -0600 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:04:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200202181604.g1IG4Cc01118@duracef.shout.net> To: gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-testresults@sources.redhat.com Subject: gdb tests with gcc 3.0.3 versus gcc 3.0.4-200202-15 X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 List-Id: I did some test runs with several versions of gdb versus gcc 3.0.3, gcc 3.0.4-20020215, and gcc gcc-3_0-branch. The tables are here: http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday_project/by-gcc-2002-02-16/index.html The test matrix has 18 configurations: target=native host=i686-pc-linux-gnulibc2.2:rh-7.2) gdb={5.1.1, gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch:20020216, HEAD} gcc={3.0.3, 3.0.4-20020215, gcc-3_0-branch:20020216} goption={-gdwarf2, -gstabs+} gdb test regressions from gcc 3.0.3 to gcc 3.0.4-20020215: *none* gdb test improvements from gcc 3.0.3 to gcc 3.0.4-20020215: gdb.base/break.exp: breakpoint at start of multi line if conditional gdb.base/break.exp: breakpoint at start of multi line while conditional gdb.base/break.exp: breakpoint info FAIL -> PASS with gdb-HEAD-g-dwarf-2 FAIL -> PASS with gdb-HEAD-g-stabs+ gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 1 gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 10 gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 2 gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 4 gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 6 gdb.base/step-line.exp: next over dummy 8 FAIL -> PASS with gdb-5.1.1-g-dwarf-2 FAIL -> PASS with gdb-5.1.1-g-stabs+ FAIL -> PASS with gdb-gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch-g-dwarf-2 FAIL -> PASS with gdb-gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch-g-stabs+ FAIL -> PASS with gdb-HEAD-g-dwarf-2 FAIL -> PASS with gdb-HEAD-g-stabs+ gdb test regressions from gcc 3.0.3 to gcc gcc-3_0-branch: gdb.base/condbreak.exp, gdb.base/funcargs.exp, gdb.c++/ovldbreak.exp: regressions in dwarf-2 configurations. I don't have time to drill down. gdb test improvements from gcc 3.0.3 to gcc gcc-3_0-branch: same as gcc 3.0.3 to gcc 3.0.4-20020215 Notes: I am cross-posting these results to lists: gcc-testresults and gdb-testresults. Someone kindly correct me if I should do something different. gdb 5.1.1 is the latest released version of gdb. gdb gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch is a nearly dead branch. I am not investigating the regressions on gcc-3_0-branch because it's not a release candidate at this time and I have limited time. If another tarball gets made then I will test the tarballs. Michael Elizabeth Chastain "love without fear"