From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24481 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2012 08:51:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 24473 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2012 08:51:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com (HELO mailout1.w1.samsung.com) (210.118.77.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:51:04 +0000 Received: from eusync1.samsung.com (mailout1.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.11]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MC400JTQTXO0C00@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:51:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from amdn392 ([106.116.61.216]) by eusync1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0MC40041ETWVWT90@eusync1.samsung.com> for gdb@sourceware.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:51:01 +0100 (BST) From: Michal Lesniewski To: 'John Gilmore' , 'Pedro Alves' Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, 'Yao Qi' References: <000001cdad12$1e2b1950$5a814bf0$%lesniewski@samsung.com> <507FD526.5080604@redhat.com> <000101cdad25$e3eda550$abc8eff0$%lesniewski@samsung.com> <507FEF69.4030008@redhat.com> <201210190028.q9J0Sd2N005583@new.toad.com> In-reply-to: <201210190028.q9J0Sd2N005583@new.toad.com> Subject: RE: Implementation of different software breakpoint kinds in gdb server Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:51:00 -0000 Message-id: <000801cdadd6$da8a3670$8f9ea350$%lesniewski@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: No Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 Ok, so all this really looks like a lot of work. I think first I'll have a look at the code in mem-break.c and try to add support for different kinds of breakpoints. This must be done first anyway, I guess. I'll let you know about my results, observations and further ideas. Thank you for your time and comments :-) Michal Lesniewski