From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10359 invoked by alias); 17 May 2003 17:05:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10231 invoked from network); 17 May 2003 17:05:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc52.attbi.com) (216.148.227.88) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2003 17:05:23 -0000 Received: from nkelseyhome (12-235-58-117.client.attbi.com[12.235.58.117]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc52) with SMTP id <2003051717052305200k5v2ve>; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:05:23 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01c31c96$7c623970$0a00a8c0@nkelseyhome> From: "Jafa" To: "Andrew Cagney" Cc: References: <037201c31c10$9a07e910$0a02a8c0@scenix.com> Subject: Re: GDB 6 schedule Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 17:05:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 Hi Andrew, The port consists of a tdep file and a remote back-end over two files (there is a lot of code in the remote back-end and two clear levels of abstraction). The trunk has moved on considerably sinse the last major release and I need some of the new features such as reg groups (several hundred registers). If there is a concern then I would be happy if a tempory branch of the gdb directory was created to work on for the next few weeks prior to merging to the trunk, however as you say, the worst that can happen is that the ip2k port doesn't work. I would appreciate your help and time to make this work. Thanks Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Cagney" To: Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 8:27 PM Subject: Re: GDB 6 schedule *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > Hi Andrew, > > I have been meaning to re-sync with the trunk and get the ip2k port > submitted but got distracted. > > Any chance we can work to get the ip2k port submitted in time? (I am not > sure what the general policy is for a quite tiem before the branch) In the past new architectures have been added to a release branch. In all cases though, the change was contained to single -tdep.c file (the worst it could do was not work). However, the changes first need to be approved for the mainline. Andrew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Cagney" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 5:57 PM > Subject: GDB 6 schedule > > > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > Here is a vague GDB 6 schedule: > > 17-05-2003 - today > 14-06-2003 - branch > 26-07-2003 - release > > That's 4 weeks to branch, and a further 6 weeks to release .... > > Andrew > > > >