From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9628 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2003 14:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9621 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 14:32:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sun.netezza.com) (209.113.240.37) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 14:32:09 -0000 Received: from astral (host20 [192.168.0.20]) by sun.netezza.com (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3OEW82T002475 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001501c30a6e$4930c880$1400a8c0@astral> Reply-To: "John S. Yates, Jr." From: "John S. Yates, Jr." To: "gdb" References: <1051187543.20001.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> Subject: Re: gdb Digest 24 Apr 2003 12:32:23 -0000 Issue 1153 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:32:00 -0000 Organization: Netezza Corporation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Jacobowitz Sent: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:17:16 -0400 Subject: Re: long long considered harmful? > ... I went through this exact thing making core dumps > work in a cross environment; ... Having just modified gdb to allow me to examine ppc cores on an x86 Linux host I am curious why if you have did this work once it has not been incorporated into the standard distribution. Is it that there are inherent architectural issues or simply an issue of cycle and priorities? /john