From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"'Tom Tromey'" <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002101cd0f36$ee5b8bc0$cb12a340$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120330220740.GA18842@adacore.com>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] De la part
> de Joel Brobecker
> Envoyé : samedi 31 mars 2012 00:08
> À : Tom Tromey
> Cc : Pierre Muller; gdb@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: gdb/gnulib problems with BSD operating systems
>
> > > Otherwise, you can tell configure that you plan to use gmake, like
> > > ".../configure MAKE=gmake". That will write the proper value into the
> > > various Makefiles. (But you shouldn't have to do this.)
> >
> > This one doesn't work, as far as I can tell. Pierre and I both
> > tried it two different ways, and configure still replaces @MAKE@
> > by make in gnulib/Makefile :-( (a bug, if you ask me, just don't
> > know where).
>
> I researched this a little bit, and I figured out why it did not
> work for me. I was calling configure with MAKE=gmake, but that has
> not effect because the top-level configure does not set MAKE.
> So, when I ran "make" (instead of gmake), it just implicitly set
> the MAKE variable to "make" rather than "gmake", and then calls
> our configure script passing that implicit MAKE=make value, which
> is not what Pierre wants.
>
> On the other hand, if I do (on x86_64-linux):
>
> % /path/to/gdb/configure
> % /home/brobecke/gmake
>
> Here is what I find in gnulib's Makefile:
>
> MAKE = /home/brobecke/gmake
>
> In other words, it should work out of the box without having to
> set anything by hand, as long as you use gmake as the top-level
> make program.
You are right,
do a simple
gmake
does work.
However, I am used to do
gmake all-gdb
and I checked by removing everything
it does fail if you use
gmake all-gdb
instead of
gmake
...
Pierre Muller
GDB pascal language maintainer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-31 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <32726.6318876811$1333031278@news.gmane.org>
2012-03-30 20:35 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-30 21:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-30 22:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-31 12:08 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2012-03-31 18:17 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <24504.7532058836$1333217860@news.gmane.org>
2012-04-02 14:18 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-05 9:44 ` Pierre Muller
2012-04-10 15:05 ` Joel Brobecker
[not found] ` <37068.5830399909$1333195740@news.gmane.org>
2012-04-02 14:17 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-29 14:27 Pierre Muller
2012-03-29 16:21 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002101cd0f36$ee5b8bc0$cb12a340$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr' \
--to=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).