From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30449 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 16:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 30432 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2012 16:03:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (HELO mailhost.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.200.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:02:57 +0000 Received: from md13.u-strasbg.fr (md13.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.248]) by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id qAGG2nZi086450 ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:02:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (ms13.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.204.113]) by md13.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id qAGG2nHF028843 ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:02:49 +0100 (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) Received: from E6510Muller (gw-ics.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.225]) (user=mullerp mech=LOGIN) by mailserver.u-strasbg.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id qAGG2mY0010830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:02:48 +0100 (envelope-from pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr) From: "Pierre Muller" To: "'Pedro Alves'" , "'Joel Brobecker'" Cc: References: <002701cdc0b9$542d2560$fc877020$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20121112180707.GQ4847@adacore.com> <50A14202.4060403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <50A14202.4060403@redhat.com> Subject: RE: run the ARI on gdbserver too? Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <005501cdc413$d3a808c0$7af81a40$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 Hi, I was wondering if I could commit as obvious ARI fixes to gdbserver=20 directory, so that, when we finally add gdbserver to the ARI directory list (in fact remove the line pruning the directory in contrib./ari/gdb_find.sh script) we would get a lower increase of the number of problems... Pierre=20 as ARI maintainer > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] De la p= art > de Pedro Alves > Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 12 novembre 2012 19:38 > =C0=A0: Joel Brobecker > Cc=A0: Pierre Muller; gdb@sourceware.org > Objet=A0: run the ARI on gdbserver too? >=20 > On 11/12/2012 06:07 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > >> > Also, I would find as a logical consequence that also > >> > gdbserver subdirectory should follow the ARI rules. > >> > This is done quite easily by removing the > >> > -name gdbserver -prune -o > >> > line from gdb_find.sh script in gdb/contrib./ari > >> > but is a rather important change that should be discussed fully. > > Right. I think it would be a helpful, but I'll let Pedro comment > > on that one. >=20 > I agree that it's a logical step. I think we'll see a lot of > hits that don't actually point at issues that are problems in > practice (due to the fact lots of gdbserver code is host/native > code that makes assumptions on the environment its being built > for, like bits of native code in gdb does), but it sounds nevertheless > a good idea, considering we'll want to share more and more between > gdb and gdbserver. >=20 > -- > Pedro Alves