Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Peter Reilley]

There is nothing illegal about this site.   I have done most
of the Linux and Solaris code on this site.   If you doubt
this, ask them at their regular site www.macraigor.com
The Wiggler is not supported under Linux and Solaris.
The Wiggler is supported under Windows.   Under Linux
and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.
The site is still a work in progress so everything is not
there yet but keep checking.

Pete.



-----Original Message-----
From: Friedrich Beckmann <friedrich.beckmann@gmx.de>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:33 PM
Subject: JTAG debug support for ARM


>Hi,
>
>i have found a site http://www.ocdemon.com which offers the gnu
>toolchain with support for wiggler/raven JTAG interfaces.  I have not
>tested this and would like to know if anybody has some experience with
>this. The sources for the Wiggler drivers are not included in the
>distribution.
>Is there any person related to this site? I cannot find any name on the
>sites pages.
>Is there something illegal behind this?
>
>As far as I have figured it out, the standard gdb release supports the
>ARM RDI interface. This requires the ANGEL software installed
>(and is then connected via a serial interface).
>
>Optionally the OLD EmbeddedICE Box which can interpret the RDI commands
>to JTAG
>commands can be used. The new MultiICE debug box from ARM requires
>software support on the host which is not available for linux at the
>moment.
>
>There is a configure option --multi-ice in the gdb release which
>lets me assume that the commercial GnuPRO tools from Redhat
>have support for the MultiICE. The multi-ice-gdbserver seems not to
>be under GNU license.
>
>The JEENI JTAG interface from http://www.episupport.com seems understand
>the RDI commands
>directly as the ARM EmbeddedICE does. So this is also usabled via the
>gdi rdi interface.
>
> http://www.abatron.ch also offers a JTAG interface but with a dedicated
>gdb driver
>software for linux. gdb.
>
>Is anybody using the wiggler with gdb for the ARM7?
>
>Which software are you using?
>
>Is anybody out there who is putting effort in writing a GNU-licensed
>remote interface
>for a low-cost JTAG interface like the wiggler?
>
>Friedrich
>
>
>
>

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
>Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
>their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported under
>Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
>Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
>site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
>keep checking.

Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if the
sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.

cgf

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Friedrich Beckmann <friedrich.beckmann@gmx.de>
>To: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
>Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:33 PM
>Subject: JTAG debug support for ARM
>>
>>i have found a site http://www.ocdemon.com which offers the gnu
>>toolchain with support for wiggler/raven JTAG interfaces.  I have not
>>tested this and would like to know if anybody has some experience with
>>this.  The sources for the Wiggler drivers are not included in the
>>distribution.  Is there any person related to this site?  I cannot find
>>any name on the sites pages.  Is there something illegal behind this?
>>
>>As far as I have figured it out, the standard gdb release supports the
>>ARM RDI interface.  This requires the ANGEL software installed (and is
>>then connected via a serial interface).
>>
>>Optionally the OLD EmbeddedICE Box which can interpret the RDI commands
>>to JTAG commands can be used.  The new MultiICE debug box from ARM
>>requires software support on the host which is not available for linux
>>at the moment.
>>
>>There is a configure option --multi-ice in the gdb release which lets
>>me assume that the commercial GnuPRO tools from Redhat have support for
>>the MultiICE.  The multi-ice-gdbserver seems not to be under GNU
>>license.
>>
>>The JEENI JTAG interface from http://www.episupport.com seems
>>understand the RDI commands directly as the ARM EmbeddedICE does.  So
>>this is also usabled via the gdi rdi interface.
>>
>> http://www.abatron.ch also offers a JTAG interface but with a dedicated
>>gdb driver software for linux.  gdb.
>>
>>Is anybody using the wiggler with gdb for the ARM7?
>>
>>Which software are you using?
>>
>>Is anybody out there who is putting effort in writing a GNU-licensed
>>remote interface for a low-cost JTAG interface like the wiggler?
>>
>>Friedrich

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Fernando Nasser]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
> >There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
> >Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
> >their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported under
> >Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
> >Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
> >site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
> >keep checking.
> 
> Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if the
> sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
> 

Furthermore, the GPL has explicit rules for Web sites: if the binary is
available for downloading from a site, the same site must provide the
sources that are necessary and sufficient to regenerate those binaries.

Providing a link to another site where there are some sources is not
enough.
And in this case the sources pointed to are not sufficient to regenerate
the
binary nor equivalent to what was used as there are certainly changes to
the
gdb code.


-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Peter Reilley]

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
To: Peter Reilley <micrio@mv.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Jim MacGregor
<jamesm@macraigor.com>
Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM


>Peter Reilley wrote:
>>
>> The site is a work in progress, not everything is there.
>> I perhaps should have waited before announcing it
>> publicly, but some people asked about it.   The
>> source is available.   Email me and I will send it
>> to you, but it is changing daily.   It will be on the
>> site.
>>
>
>Peter,
>
>I am not the Copyright holder.  It is the Free Software Foundation.
>They have "given" it to the world, but under the GPL, what means that
>legally it is "owned" by the FSF.
>
>As I said, they distribute it under a license and we are free to use and
>redistribute it under this license.  Violating this license in any of its
>clauses is as illegal as making illegal copies of a Microsoft product.
>
>As I was told, the first problem that befalls on someone who distributes
>GPL software and does not comply with the GPL terms is that this person or
>institution has the rights to redistributed it revoked for life (at the
>FSF discretion, of course).
>
>If you distribute the software by opto-magnetic means you have the option
>of making the source available by mail, charging a reasonable fee to cover
the
>media, processing and mailing.  But if you make it available for
downloading
>you *must* make the sources available from the same site and anyone must be
>able to reproduce the binary you are distributing.


I offer the source free for the asking by email.   When it is stable
it will be on the web site.  I think that you are being a little picky here.
The code is being actively worked on.   Perhaps my fault is in releasing
the binaries too soon.

>With regards to the DLL issue, the GPL makes clear exemption to the
Operating
>System and standard programing environment libraries that are distributed
>with an Operating System.  It allows for nothing that are distributed
>separately or under a fee.  As any Lawyer will explain to you, if it is not
>clear that you can do it, DON'T!


The libraries in question were derived from the DLL's available on
Windows.   The Windows work was done by Red Hat.   My work
was to do the same thing for Linux.


>I understand that you have helped set up this site and that you made it
>available with the best intentions in mind: helping people who wants to
>use this product (that I hear is quite nice) and the GNU tools.  This is
>very commendable but you must first convince the Copyright holder and get
>an exemption from them or comply with the existing terms.

I believe that we are in complience now.



>You should inform whoever is responsible from that Web site of the terms
and
>conditions of the GPL and the legal consequences that can result of
violating
>a software license in the United States of America.


>
>> Pete.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
>> To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
>> Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
>>
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>> >> >There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
>> >> >Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
>> >> >their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported
under
>> >> >Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
>> >> >Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
>> >> >site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
>> >> >keep checking.
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if
the
>> >> sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Furthermore, the GPL has explicit rules for Web sites: if the binary is
>> >available for downloading from a site, the same site must provide the
>> >sources that are necessary and sufficient to regenerate those binaries.
>> >
>> >Providing a link to another site where there are some sources is not
>> >enough.
>> >And in this case the sources pointed to are not sufficient to regenerate
>> >the
>> >binary nor equivalent to what was used as there are certainly changes to
>> >the
>> >gdb code.
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Fernando Nasser
>> >Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
>> >2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
>> >Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
>> >
>
>--
>Fernando Nasser
>Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
>2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
>Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
>

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Peter Reilley]

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Meissner <meissner@cygnus.com>
To: Peter Reilley <micrio@mv.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM


>On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:07:38PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>> I do not believe that there is any question of legality.   Gdb
>> is commonly used with libraries that are not available as
>> source.   For example; running it on Solaris, etc.   What
>> about if I bought the accelerated X server that Red Hat
>> sold.   Must I not run gdb?
>
>Quoting from section 3 of the GPL:
>
> The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
> making modifications to it.  For an executable work, complete source
> code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
> associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
> control compilation and installation of the executable.  However, as a
> special exception, the source code distributed need not include
> anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
> form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
> operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
> itself accompanies the executable.
>
>So the answer is you can run GDB providing it was linked against system
>libraries, even if you do not have source for those libraries.



Is short, we conform.   Do you want more examples?   Are we
going to play with the definition of "library" and "system".


>> The Linux community recognizes that to win in the public
>> arena some software will not be GPL'ed.   Indeed, most
>> people actively encourage commercial software to be
>> ported to Linux.
>
>However, the Free Software Foundation does have the rights to control
software
>it writes (or is assigned to it).  If you don't like the controls, you are
free
>not to use the software.  You are not free to do something with GPL
software
>that goes against the owners wishes (ie, link with non-GPL software that
isn't
>provided with the major components of the system).
>
>> I have written GLP'ed software and I have written commercial
>> software.  This project gives me the opportunity to give to the Linux
>> community something that previously was only available
>> under Windows.
>
>It is GPL, not GLP.
>

Yes, a typo.

Pete.

>--
>Michael Meissner, Red Hat, Inc.  (GCC group)
>PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA
>Work:   meissner@redhat.com phone: +1 978-486-9304
>Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org fax:   +1 978-692-4482
>

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Fernando Nasser]

Peter Reilley wrote:
> 
> The site is a work in progress, not everything is there.
> I perhaps should have waited before announcing it
> publicly, but some people asked about it.   The
> source is available.   Email me and I will send it
> to you, but it is changing daily.   It will be on the
> site.
>

Peter,

I am not the Copyright holder.  It is the Free Software Foundation.
They have "given" it to the world, but under the GPL, what means that 
legally it is "owned" by the FSF.

As I said, they distribute it under a license and we are free to use and
redistribute it under this license.  Violating this license in any of its
clauses is as illegal as making illegal copies of a Microsoft product.

As I was told, the first problem that befalls on someone who distributes
GPL software and does not comply with the GPL terms is that this person or
institution has the rights to redistributed it revoked for life (at the
FSF discretion, of course).

If you distribute the software by opto-magnetic means you have the option 
of making the source available by mail, charging a reasonable fee to cover the
media, processing and mailing.  But if you make it available for downloading
you *must* make the sources available from the same site and anyone must be
able to reproduce the binary you are distributing.

With regards to the DLL issue, the GPL makes clear exemption to the Operating
System and standard programing environment libraries that are distributed
with an Operating System.  It allows for nothing that are distributed 
separately or under a fee.  As any Lawyer will explain to you, if it is not
clear that you can do it, DON'T!

I understand that you have helped set up this site and that you made it 
available with the best intentions in mind: helping people who wants to
use this product (that I hear is quite nice) and the GNU tools.  This is
very commendable but you must first convince the Copyright holder and get
an exemption from them or comply with the existing terms.

You should inform whoever is responsible from that Web site of the terms and
conditions of the GPL and the legal consequences that can result of violating
a software license in the United States of America.




 
> Pete.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
> To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
> Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM
> 
> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
> >> >There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
> >> >Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
> >> >their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported under
> >> >Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
> >> >Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
> >> >site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
> >> >keep checking.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if the
> >> sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
> >>
> >
> >Furthermore, the GPL has explicit rules for Web sites: if the binary is
> >available for downloading from a site, the same site must provide the
> >sources that are necessary and sufficient to regenerate those binaries.
> >
> >Providing a link to another site where there are some sources is not
> >enough.
> >And in this case the sources pointed to are not sufficient to regenerate
> >the
> >binary nor equivalent to what was used as there are certainly changes to
> >the
> >gdb code.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Fernando Nasser
> >Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> >2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> >Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
> >

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Michael Meissner]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:07:38PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
> I do not believe that there is any question of legality.   Gdb
> is commonly used with libraries that are not available as 
> source.   For example; running it on Solaris, etc.   What
> about if I bought the accelerated X server that Red Hat
> sold.   Must I not run gdb?

Quoting from section 3 of the GPL:

	The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
	making modifications to it.  For an executable work, complete source
	code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
	associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to
	control compilation and installation of the executable.  However, as a
	special exception, the source code distributed need not include
	anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary
	form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the
	operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
	itself accompanies the executable.

So the answer is you can run GDB providing it was linked against system
libraries, even if you do not have source for those libraries.

> The Linux community recognizes that to win in the public
> arena some software will not be GPL'ed.   Indeed, most
> people actively encourage commercial software to be
> ported to Linux.

However, the Free Software Foundation does have the rights to control software
it writes (or is assigned to it).  If you don't like the controls, you are free
not to use the software.  You are not free to do something with GPL software
that goes against the owners wishes (ie, link with non-GPL software that isn't
provided with the major components of the system).

> I have written GLP'ed software and I have written commercial 
> software.  This project gives me the opportunity to give to the Linux
> community something that previously was only available
> under Windows.

It is GPL, not GLP.

-- 
Michael Meissner, Red Hat, Inc.  (GCC group)
PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA
Work:	  meissner@redhat.com		phone: +1 978-486-9304
Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org	fax:   +1 978-692-4482

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Peter Reilley]

The site is a work in progress, not everything is there.
I perhaps should have waited before announcing it
publicly, but some people asked about it.   The
source is available.   Email me and I will send it
to you, but it is changing daily.   It will be on the
site.

Pete.

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM


>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>> >There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
>> >Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
>> >their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported under
>> >Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
>> >Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
>> >site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
>> >keep checking.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if the
>> sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
>> 
>
>Furthermore, the GPL has explicit rules for Web sites: if the binary is
>available for downloading from a site, the same site must provide the
>sources that are necessary and sufficient to regenerate those binaries.
>
>Providing a link to another site where there are some sources is not
>enough.
>And in this case the sources pointed to are not sufficient to regenerate
>the
>binary nor equivalent to what was used as there are certainly changes to
>the
>gdb code.
>
>
>-- 
>Fernando Nasser
>Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
>2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
>Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
>

Re: JTAG debug support for ARM

[Peter Reilley]

I do not believe that there is any question of legality.   Gdb
is commonly used with libraries that are not available as 
source.   For example; running it on Solaris, etc.   What
about if I bought the accelerated X server that Red Hat
sold.   Must I not run gdb?

The Linux community recognizes that to win in the public
arena some software will not be GPL'ed.   Indeed, most
people actively encourage commercial software to be
ported to Linux.

I have written GLP'ed software and I have written commercial 
software.  This project gives me the opportunity to give to the Linux
community something that previously was only available
under Windows.


Pete.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Thursday, January 25, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: JTAG debug support for ARM


>On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:01:23PM -0500, Peter Reilley wrote:
>>There is nothing illegal about this site.  I have done most of the
>>Linux and Solaris code on this site.  If you doubt this, ask them at
>>their regular site www.macraigor.com The Wiggler is not supported under
>>Linux and Solaris.  The Wiggler is supported under Windows.  Under
>>Linux and Solaris the Raven and Ethernet products are supported.  The
>>site is still a work in progress so everything is not there yet but
>>keep checking.
>
>Unfortunately, the question of legality is open to interpretation if the
>sources for the DLL are not provided and if the DLL is used with GDB.
>
>cgf
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Friedrich Beckmann <friedrich.beckmann@gmx.de>
>>To: gdb@sources.redhat.com <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
>>Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:33 PM
>>Subject: JTAG debug support for ARM
>>>
>>>i have found a site http://www.ocdemon.com which offers the gnu
>>>toolchain with support for wiggler/raven JTAG interfaces.  I have not
>>>tested this and would like to know if anybody has some experience with
>>>this.  The sources for the Wiggler drivers are not included in the
>>>distribution.  Is there any person related to this site?  I cannot find
>>>any name on the sites pages.  Is there something illegal behind this?
>>>
>>>As far as I have figured it out, the standard gdb release supports the
>>>ARM RDI interface.  This requires the ANGEL software installed (and is
>>>then connected via a serial interface).
>>>
>>>Optionally the OLD EmbeddedICE Box which can interpret the RDI commands
>>>to JTAG commands can be used.  The new MultiICE debug box from ARM
>>>requires software support on the host which is not available for linux
>>>at the moment.
>>>
>>>There is a configure option --multi-ice in the gdb release which lets
>>>me assume that the commercial GnuPRO tools from Redhat have support for
>>>the MultiICE.  The multi-ice-gdbserver seems not to be under GNU
>>>license.
>>>
>>>The JEENI JTAG interface from http://www.episupport.com seems
>>>understand the RDI commands directly as the ARM EmbeddedICE does.  So
>>>this is also usabled via the gdi rdi interface.
>>>
>>> http://www.abatron.ch also offers a JTAG interface but with a dedicated
>>>gdb driver software for linux.  gdb.
>>>
>>>Is anybody using the wiggler with gdb for the ARM7?
>>>
>>>Which software are you using?
>>>
>>>Is anybody out there who is putting effort in writing a GNU-licensed
>>>remote interface for a low-cost JTAG interface like the wiggler?
>>>
>>>Friedrich
>

JTAG debug support for ARM

[Friedrich Beckmann]

Hi,

i have found a site http://www.ocdemon.com which offers the gnu
toolchain with support for wiggler/raven JTAG interfaces.  I have not
tested this and would like to know if anybody has some experience with
this. The sources for the Wiggler drivers are not included in the
distribution.
Is there any person related to this site? I cannot find any name on the
sites pages.
Is there something illegal behind this?

As far as I have figured it out, the standard gdb release supports the
ARM RDI interface. This requires the ANGEL software installed
(and is then connected via a serial interface).

Optionally the OLD EmbeddedICE Box which can interpret the RDI commands
to JTAG
commands can be used. The new MultiICE debug box from ARM requires
software support on the host which is not available for linux at the
moment.

There is a configure option --multi-ice in the gdb release which
lets me assume that the commercial GnuPRO tools from Redhat
have support for the MultiICE. The multi-ice-gdbserver seems not to
be under GNU license.

The JEENI JTAG interface from http://www.episupport.com seems understand
the RDI commands
directly as the ARM EmbeddedICE does. So this is also usabled via the
gdi rdi interface.

http://www.abatron.ch also offers a JTAG interface but with a dedicated
gdb driver
software for linux. gdb.

Is anybody using the wiggler with gdb for the ARM7?

Which software are you using?

Is anybody out there who is putting effort in writing a GNU-licensed
remote interface
for a low-cost JTAG interface like the wiggler?

Friedrich