From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29040 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2003 20:36:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29031 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2003 20:36:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydra.ubicom.com) (4.20.168.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jul 2003 20:36:32 -0000 Received: FROM fenway.scenix.com BY hydra.ubicom.com ; Thu Jul 03 13:34:31 2003 -0700 Received: from nkelseyxp (NKELSEY-XP [192.168.1.187]) by fenway.scenix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id 31X7LW6R; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:34:28 -0700 Message-ID: <009101c341a2$81adbc20$0a02a8c0@scenix.com> Reply-To: "Nick Kelsey" From: "Nick Kelsey" To: Subject: Frame context problem Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 20:36:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 Hi guys, So close... so close :-) Situation: At the end of a function, click step-over or step-into... - single steps until it reaches the epilogue stub. - asks for the frame, I return the FP as it was for the function, and the PC return address to get back to the caller. - gdb inserts a breakpoint at the return address I specified. - gdb runs and stops at the breakpoint correctly. - gdb removes the breakpoint, single steps, re-inserts the breakpoint and continues!!! So it must think that the context is wrong... can you please point me in the right direction? Where is the decision made regarding deciding if this was were it was ment to stop? Thnaks Nick