From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28287 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2007 16:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 28221 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2007 16:40:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp121.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (HELO smtp121.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.95.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:39:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 2789 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2007 16:39:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdelaney2) (onramp123@76.176.127.175 with login) by smtp121.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2007 16:39:49 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: VAoujG4VM1nX2bh2h4iFNZ9pfEeUZsG98btWbld4J.yckGIl6F1xHtNgDyIVT86DdxNl1xNCfg-- Received: from sdelaney2 ([127.0.0.1]) by [127.0.0.1] with ESMTP (SpamPal v1.594) sender ; 10 Dec 2007 08:37:03 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Steve DeLaney" To: "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" Cc: Subject: RE: BDI interfering with gdbserver on PPC target Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <00bc01c83b4a$e5517a40$6603a8c0@sdelaney2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20071123034732.GA12335@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 Well it took a while but finally isolated this issue. It's a little esoteric perhaps but for future reference BDI can be controlled with the config file by disabling VECTOR CATCH Similarly a Xilinx XMD JTAG debugger had the same problem. in that case it's a matter of writing a PPC405 SPR DBCR0 to configure internal debug. -----Original Message----- From: gdb-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Jacobowitz Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 7:48 PM To: Steve DeLaney Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: BDI interfering with gdbserver on PPC target On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 04:12:02PM -0800, Steve DeLaney wrote: > can it be that BDI is interfering with the trap instruction? Yes, this happens on a lot of different targets. There's nothing we can do about it - you'd have to talk to the kernel folks or the BDI supplier. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery