From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17080 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2004 09:10:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17067 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 09:10:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 09:10:15 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-208-187.inter.net.il [80.230.208.187]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CTU46532 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:09:57 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:28:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4ad16$Blat.v2.2.2$426de2c0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: bob@brasko.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41645106.1060106@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:09:42 -0400) Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20041003170104.GC7030@white> <41644306.2090603@gnu.org> <20041006191950.GP12213@white> <41645106.1060106@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:09:42 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: GDB > > I'm simply pointing out the obvious - what we don't test [likely] > doesn't work. Well, that's true, but there _are_ tests for mi1 in testsuite/gdb.mi.