From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19569 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2004 16:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19544 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 16:34:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 16:34:45 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-196-71.inter.net.il [80.230.196.71]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.3-GR) with ESMTP id CTW52474 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:34:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:16:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: "Dave Korn" Message-ID: <01c4ad54$Blat.v2.2.2$5fc635a0@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (dk@artimi.com) Subject: Re: Discussion: Formalizing the deprecation process in GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 > From: "Dave Korn" > Cc: , > > Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:30:36 +0100 > > 3.3 Single Stepping > 3.4 Signal Handling > 3.5 Thread Handling > 3.6 Inferior Function Calls > > [ Section 4 User Interface ] > > 4.3 Console Printing > 4.4 TUI > > [ Section 9 Target Architecture Definition ] > > 9.7 Frame Interpretation > 9.8 Inferior Call Setup > 9.9 Compiler Characteristics > > [ Section 10 Target Vector Definition ] > > 10.3 ROM Monitor Interface > 10.4 Custom Protocols > 10.5 Transport Layer > > [ Section 11 Native Debugging ] > > 11.2 ptrace > 11.3 /proc > 11.4 win32 > 11.5 shared libraries > > [ Section 12 Support Libraries ] > 12.3 readline > 12.4 mmalloc > > 12.7 include Thanks for the footwork. Yes, these are the empty sections, sigh. They await volunteers to document the related features. The one for readline could use part of the Readline's docs, though. I will try to make that happen.