public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: new option --readnever & script gstack?
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c4d151$Blat.v2.2.2$ca52d9c0@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41A24D4E.6090301@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:34:22 -0500)

> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:34:22 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> 
> As the oposite to --readnow, I'd like to propose a new option 
> --readnever (i.e., don't read in the symbolic debug inf).  That and a 
> few lines of script should let GDB implemement a direct equivalent to 
> pstack (called gstack say).

An alternative to this would be to have a --read=WHEN switch, which
could accept 3 arguments: `now', `asneeded' (the default), and
`never'.

However, I must admit that, like Mark, I don't see the situation where
this would be useful.  Could you perhaps describe such a situation,
and explain how the existance of the new option would help, including
the auxiliary script and the relation to `pstack'?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-11-23 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-22 20:52 Andrew Cagney
2004-11-22 21:42 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-22 22:24   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-23 11:46     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-23 12:28 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2004-11-23 16:34   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-23 21:21     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-23 21:46       ` Andrew Burgess
2004-11-24  9:19         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-29 16:11           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-29 16:14             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-29 17:50               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-29 22:08             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-24 18:04       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2004-11-23 16:58 Bloch, Jack
2004-11-23 20:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-24  3:44 Bloch, Jack
2004-11-24  6:56 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c4d151$Blat.v2.2.2$ca52d9c0@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).