From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17572 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2004 19:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17541 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 19:59:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 19:59:35 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-204-132.inter.net.il [80.230.204.132]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DFQ41785 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:59:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:08:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-ID: <01c4d64d$Blat.v2.2.2$98df1880@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: aab@cichlid.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41AB492A.8070804@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:07:06 -0500) Subject: Re: new option --readnever & script gstack? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <41A24D4E.6090301@redhat.com> <01c4d151$Blat.v2.2.2$ca52d9c0@zahav.net.il> <41A363FE.9060307@redhat.com> <01c4d19d$Blat.v2.2.2$0109b2e0@zahav.net.il> <01c4d1f2$Blat.v2.2.2$5a3f3880@zahav.net.il> <41AB492A.8070804@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:07:06 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > Cc: Andrew Burgess , gdb@sources.redhat.com > > So, ..., would a gstack.sh script and an option to disable symbolic > debug information reading be useful additions to GDB? I don't object to the option, but would like the script's functionality be part of GDB itself. The advantage of this is that the feature then would be more portable, e.g. to Windows, where not everyone runs under Bash. Are there any downsides?